Franchise and welfare

Keith McKinley made the following comment at Monty Pelerin’s blog  (emphasis mine):

John Stuart Mill’s 1861 [observed] that it was “required by first principals that the receipt of parish relief [welfare] should be a peremptory disqualification for the franchise.” Representation without taxation is every bit as evil as taxation without representation.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s