Anti-Vaxxer Myths are Hate Speech

By Dr. Peter W. Dunn, PhD

COVID 19 propaganda has led to a level of hatred and prejudice that is unprecedented in my lifetime. That is hardly surprising since the real message of COVID 19 protocols is loneliness, alienation, and fear. People think that the message is, “My mask protects you, your mask protects me.” But the real message is “My mask projects my hatred and fear of you, your mask projects your hatred and fear of me.” It’s the universal destruction of community that I call the New Xenophobia. But no one receives more disgust than the so-called “anti-vaxxers”.

But when you ask people who the anti-vaxxers are, they may say the unvaccinated. In the province of Ontario, children under 12 are all unvaccinated from COVID 19—are they and their parents anti-vaxxers? Well, no they aren’t since they haven’t been given the opportunity for the vaccine yet, but soon. I asked also if people with medical exemptions are anti-vaxxers and some haters would exclude them, because they have a “legitimate” reason not to get the vaccine. But when I point out that anyone who declines the vaccine has a legitimate reason, the argument is lost on them. Legitimate suggests lawful, and in Ontario it is your lawful right to decline any medical treatment, preventative, or diagnostic. Thus, everyone who declines a vaccine has a legitimate reason.

Etymologically anti-vaxxer comes from two words, “anti-” and “vaccine”, which would thus lead to the conclusion that the person opposes vaccines, and indeed that is the main definition of the term. But the term has no nuance in the mouth of fearful haters. A pediatrician who vaccinates children in his clinic, like Dr. Paul Thomas of the Vaccine Friendly Plan, will be called an anti-vaxxer because he disagrees with the hyper-vaccine schedule of the CDC. But he’s had much better results with his children–for example, fewer children under his plan end up with autism (see image). There are also many MDs who have vaccinated children and adults in their clinics for years, but have deep reservations about the way the COVID 19 vaccines have been brought to market, or who have seen side effects that would cause them to balk—these MDs are also getting labelled “anti-vaxxers”.

It is therefore much more subtle and precise to refer to people as vaccine hesitant. They hesitate regarding one or all vaccines; or they hesitate about getting it for themselves and their children—they may be worried about you and your children, but they aren’t actively trying to stand in your way of getting a vaccine. But to label every level of vaccine hesitant people as anti-vaxxers is hate rhetoric. It corresponds neither with reality nor with neighborliness, and that means the rhetoric will necessarily lead to human rights abuses and crimes against humanity, if it continues unabated. Anti-vaxxer rhetoric is a hate crime; it is demagoguery because governments and the mainstream news often are blaming the vaccine hesitant for killing people with COVID 19, when the fault lies elsewhere. This anti-vaxx hate speech is an expression of the worst tendencies in humanity and is similar to the racism and other forms of hate which have lead to historical crimes against humanity.

In this speech, I’d like to deal with myths about anti-vaxxers, as the term is used by the haters.

  • Anti-vaxxers are anti-vaxx. A I have pointed out, this is incorrect because there is a spectrum of vaccine hesitancy. I’ve seen people and health care workers who oppose COVID 19 but not opposed to other better-tested vaccines. I’ve seen some who are vaccine injured who oppose all vaccines for themselves but won’t stand in the way of you getting one. I’ve also seen people who think that all vaccines are inherently dangerous but are still not trying to prevent others from getting vaccines. What all vaccine hesitant people want is vaccine choice—and that is their right in Ontario under laws that protect informed consent.
  • Anti-vaxxers are stupid or crazy. My experience shows that the vaccine hesitant  are hardly stupid. They are forced to do their research because they have taken a very unpopular position. It is wrong to say that they have cognitive bias—let’s reserve that for those who are on the payroll of big vaccine companies whose bias is evidently geared towards making big profits. Financial incentive is a big reason for cognitive bias. I have  PhD in an unrelated field—but I am trained and quite capable in research. Some of my other vaccine hesitant facebook friends have PhDs in related fields. These are not stupid people. Calling the vaccine hesitant “stupid” or “crazy” is just simply a case of pure prejudice and it is very dangerous rhetoric which can lead to violence. It must stop.
  • Anti-vaxxers will win the Darwin awards. The idea is that less intelligent people will die early deaths because they do stupid things. But this is a misuse of the doctrine of evolution. The Survival of the Fittest would suggest perhaps that the vaccinated are even arguably the weaker people because they need a immune crutch to survive COVID 19; while the vaccine hesitant are happy in many cases to depend on their innate immunity to protect them from COVID 19 and any other viral threat to their health. I would argue that the doctrines of Darwin works in precisely the opposite way that these people contend.
  • The anti-vaxxers are now 90% of “cases” or “hospitalizations”.  The problem with this notion is that there are now fully vaccinated people in heavily vaccinated countries that are dying or hospitalized with COVID 19. These include countries like Iceland, Israel, and Seychelles are experiencing “waves” despite the high vaccination rate. Sure in Ontario, it could be for the moment that most of the hospitalizations are of people not yet fully vaccinated. I’ve seen it reported as 90% sick people are unvaccinated. But even if that is the case, the number of total hospitalizations is so small that it presents a risk of about 1 in 40,000 or .003%! Saying that 90% of cases are unvaccinated is an example of lying with statistics by using relative risk instead of absolute risk. Your relative risk of hospitalization with COVID 19 as an unvaccinated person is 90%, a big number. But your absolute risk is less than .003%, a very small number.
  • Anti-vaxxers are causing Delta and other variants. This view is refuted by none other than some of the top virologists in the world, such as Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier and Geert vanden Bossche. Vaccine resistant strains of viruses are made in people that have had the vaccine, not in those who haven’t had them. From an evolutionary point of view it is comparable to antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria that are bred in the bodies of those people and animals who have had the antibiotic, not in those who have never taken them.
  • Anti-vaxxers are evil people, essentially murderers. With not even the slightest proof the mainstream media has again and again accused anti-vaxxers of being the reason for new waves and cases. But on the other side of their mouths, they have warned that vaccinated people can both contract and pass on the coronavirus. Thus, to blame the unvaccinated and thus “anti-vaxxers” for the deaths is pure demagoguery and it is dangerous rhetoric that will lead to violence against innocent people. Furthermore, they undermine their own argument for getting the vaccine. Why get a vaccine if the unvaccinated are going to kill you anyways? Doesn’t your vaccine save you? Then what are you worried about?

Here then are six myths about anti-vaxxers that are a dangerous form of hate rhetoric. These myths are unscientific rubbish but will likely lead to serious crimes against humanity by people driven by fear and hatred. Many people in the media, government, and even neighbors on social media are treating the vaccine hesitant as less than human; it is always dehumanizing to be subject to this kind of hate. It needs to stop, but I have no idea how to stop it except to call it what it is: A HATE CRIME.

(This speech was delivered at Bathurst and Rutherford Roads on August 8, 2021, at the Vaughan anti-lockdown protest).

8 thoughts on “Anti-Vaxxer Myths are Hate Speech

  1. I am not sure if you are aware of this report which highlights that the unvaccinated are 15 times more likely to be hospitalized vs the fully vaccinated…

    On page 23:

    Click to access covid-19-epi-confirmed-cases-post-vaccination.pdf

    “Unvaccinated individual refers to individuals that have not received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, as well as individuals that are not yet protected from vaccination (0 to 13 days following dose 1 administration).”

    So if someone has a first injection and has a reaction in less then 2 weeks ( I know many people that have), and they go to the hospital & test positive (because of the high PCR cycling threshold above 25), and the fact that their body produces spike proteins from the injection, which causes the illness …they are counted as a Covid illness or death or hospitalization due to being unvaccinated. …This is a complete lie.. they are actually a vaccine injury..
    As per Bill Gates favourite book,
    “How to Lie with Statistics”

    Otherwise why doesn’t Health Ontario differentiate between the people that had a vaccine but less than 2 weeks passed and those that didn’t have one at all…. they don’t because that would show a completely different reality of the people being hospitalized..

    I think this information is very important and should be questioned, right now the message that the “unvaccinated are over 15X more likely to be hospitalized “ is a lie, but it is posted all over main stream and social media. If there is anyway you can help get it out to the public that would be appreciated.
    Thank you

    • Hello from the UK

      I thought you might like to know I believe this 100%. I keep finding people on the internet saying that a relative has been unwell or even died from the vaccine.

      I even wonder about my great aunt who died recently (she was a lot younger than her husband so more of my mother’s generation in age). Whilst not young, I strongly suspect she might have been vaccinated shortly before being taken ill. Given what is going on I am highly suspicious and such matters need thorough checking.

      If you are interested I have done a post on vaccines. Please use as you see fit.

      Kind regards

      Baldmichael Theresoluteprotector’sson

  2. Pingback: Why PhDs Dissent on COVID 19 | The Righteous Investor

  3. Hello from the UK

    Thank you very much for your post. Very useful to address these ridiculous claims by those who want to force the unnecessary vaccines which will merely make large sums of money for big pharma etc whilst maiming and killing numbers of people.

    Those who make the claims are trying to deflect the blame for their own actions. Apart from the first on your list, all the other 5 items should have the word ‘anti-vaxxers’ replaced with ‘vaxxers’. Of course many are blinded by the advertising around the benefits of vaccines and lash out uncomprehendingly as they have lost the ability to think critically due to years of brain washing.

    But I see much deliberate lying from those who love to lie and ignore the truth.

    As regards the first in your list, I appreciate that those who are against the Covid 19 vax are not necessarily against vaxs in general.

    I used to think that vaccines were of some use until I researched last year at 60 years old. I then realised how gross has been the deception over vaccines, all vaccines. The boosting of immunity via vitamins and minerals in good food has been under assault for many decades now. It is the big pharma and big farmer who seek to gain from this among others.

    You may be interested to see my research and arguments why I am saying what I do. Please note I do use humour to lighten the mood.

    Kind regards

    Baldmichael Theresoluteprotector’sson

  4. Excellent article, and very much the truth.
    I for one, have been anti-vax since the early 80’s, the only “shots” I received was during my “toddler” age in the early 50’s.
    We realize that those who oppose the truth shall HATE those that speak it, and has that not been the case all throughout the centuries, before and after the birth and death of our dear Lord? Was it not the same for all those prophets in the old, for the Apostles during the new?
    Those that oppose the truth, HATE the light which comes from the truth to reveal the darkness of lies that dwells within their hearts and minds.

    Thank you for writing this…..
    The Lord bless you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s